1991 January 10

Forced Contraception Challenged

 

An order by a county court judge in California, requiring a woman to use Norplant as a condition of probation, raised the issue of forced contraception. Norplant, a birth control device that is implanted under the skin, had only recently been approved by the FDA. The woman in this case had been convicted of beating two of her four children with a belt, and faced a four-year prison sentence if she refused to have the Norplant device implanted. An attorney for the ACLU of Northern California challenged the judge’s ruling on this day, citing a 1984 California case in which an appellate court ruled that requiring contraception as a condition of probation was unconstitutional.

Learn about the history of forced contraception here.

Learn more at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project: https://www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom

Learn more at Planned Parenthood: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/

Find a Day

Go
Abortion Rights ACLU african-americans Alice Paul anti-communism Anti-Communist Hysteria Birth Control Brown v. Board of Education Censorship CIA Civil Rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 Cold War Espionage Act FBI First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment freedom of speech Free Speech Gay Rights Hate Speech homosexuality Hoover, J. Edgar HUAC Japanese American Internment King, Dr. Martin Luther Ku Klux Klan Labor Unions Lesbian and Gay Rights Loyalty Oaths McCarthy, Sen. Joe New York Times Obscenity Police Misconduct Same-Sex Marriage Separation of Church and State Sex Discrimination Smith Act Spying Spying on Americans Vietnam War Voting Rights Voting Rights Act of 1965 War on Terror Watergate White House Women's Rights Women's Suffrage World War I World War II Relocation Camps

Topics

Tell Us What You Think

We want to hear your comments, criticisms and suggestions!