2013 August 12

NYC Police’s Stop and Frisk Practices Ruled Unconstitutional

 

A U.S. District Court judge, in Floyd v. New York City on this day, declared the “stop and frisk” practices of the New York City Police Department (NYPD) unconstitutional, in violation of both the Fourth and the Fourteenth Amendments.

The stop-and-frisk controversy had raged for 14 years in the city, while the NYPD and Mayor Michael Bloomberg refused to listen to continuing community complaints. At its peak in 2012, NYPD officers stopped over 600,000 people, and frisked about half of them. Annually, about 86 percent of those stopped were people of color. Additionally, only 12 percent of those stopped were arrested or given a citation, meaning that the police were wrong in 88 percent of the stops.

The NYPD, evidently responding to the public controversy, began to reduce the number of stops and frisks about two years before the court decision on this day. The number continued to fall after the decision. At the same time, crime in New York City continued to decline, undermining the argument of the NYPD and NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg that stops and frisks were a necessary crime-fighting tactic.

The Supreme Court established the law of stops and frisks in the case of Terry v. Ohio (June 10, 1968). Under that decision, a “stop, which is a temporary detention,” is justified only when an officer has “reasonable suspicion” that the person is committing or is about to commit a crime. The judge ordered a sweeping set of reforms for the NYPD, including a new stop-and-frisk report form and improved procedures for the review of officers’ conduct in stop and frisk situations.

Essential reading: Michael D. White and Henry F. Fradella, Stop and Frisk: The Use and Abuse of a Controversial Policing Tactic (2016)

Learn more about the case and its history at the Center for Constitutional Rights: http://ccrjustice.org/

Read: Stephen Schulhofer, More Essential Than Ever: The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century (2012)

Learn more about curbing police misconduct: Samuel Walker and Carol Archbold, The New World of Police Accountability, 3rd ed. (2020)

Find a Day

Go
Abortion Rights ACLU african-americans Alice Paul anti-communism Anti-Communist Hysteria Birth Control Brown v. Board of Education Censorship CIA Civil Rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 Cold War Espionage Act FBI First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment freedom of speech Free Speech Gay Rights Hate Speech homosexuality Hoover, J. Edgar HUAC Japanese American Internment King, Dr. Martin Luther Ku Klux Klan Labor Unions Lesbian and Gay Rights Loyalty Oaths McCarthy, Sen. Joe New York Times Obscenity Police Misconduct Same-Sex Marriage Separation of Church and State Sex Discrimination Smith Act Spying Spying on Americans Vietnam War Voting Rights Voting Rights Act of 1965 War on Terror Watergate White House Women's Rights Women's Suffrage World War I World War II Relocation Camps

Topics

Tell Us What You Think

We want to hear your comments, criticisms and suggestions!