1964 March 9

“Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open:” The Meaning of the First Amendment

 

Justice William Brennan’s opinion in the Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan on this day is generally regarded as on of the most profound statements of the meaning of free speech in a democracy. It rivals, and in fact builds on, Justice Louis Brandeis’ greatest opinions on the subject.

In the crucial passage, Brennan wrote that the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment means “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.”

The New York Times v. Sullivan case was one of many cases arising from the Civil Rights Movement that had a profound impact on the course of American constitutional law. Decided together with Abernathy v. Sullivan on this day, the case concerned a full-page ad in The New York Times on March 29, 1960, which alleged that the arrest of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., for perjury in Alabama was part of a campaign to destroy King’s efforts to integrate public facilities and encourage blacks to vote. L. B. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, filed a libel action against the newspaper and four black ministers who were listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against the Montgomery police defamed him personally.

The Court ruled that, without the show of malice, the case would severely cripple the safeguards of freedoms of speech and expression that are guaranteed in the First Amendment and applicable to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.

See the Original Advertisement: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/documented-rights/exhibit/section4/detail/heed-rising-voices.html

Justice Brennan’s classic opinion, in part:

Read: Anthony Lewis, Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment (1991)

Listen to the oral arguments before the Supreme Court: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39

And read: Kermit Hall and Melvin Urofsky, New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press (2011)

See a timeline for important rulings regarding the First Amendment at the First Amendment Center:
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/first-amendment-timeline

Find a Day

Go
Abortion Rights ACLU african-americans Alice Paul anti-communism Anti-Communist Hysteria Birth Control Brown v. Board of Education Censorship CIA Civil Rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 Cold War Espionage Act FBI First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment freedom of speech Free Speech Gay Rights Hate Speech homosexuality Hoover, J. Edgar HUAC Japanese American Internment King, Dr. Martin Luther Ku Klux Klan Labor Unions Lesbian and Gay Rights Loyalty Oaths McCarthy, Sen. Joe New York Times Obscenity Police Misconduct Same-Sex Marriage Separation of Church and State Sex Discrimination Smith Act Spying Spying on Americans Vietnam War Voting Rights Voting Rights Act of 1965 War on Terror Watergate White House Women's Rights Women's Suffrage World War I World War II Relocation Camps

Topics

Tell Us What You Think

We want to hear your comments, criticisms and suggestions!